The Claimant sought recovery of the debt and a penalty for the payment of the goods under the contract of delivery. The Respondent accepted the goods without comment but did not pay for the disputed deliveries. The panel noted that although the Claimant’s pre-trial claim against the Respondent contained 24 waybills, and the claim for 32 waybills, the Claimant had nevertheless complied with the claim in the circumstances of the case.